Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Theriogenology ; 222: 54-65, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621344

ABSTRACT

Coat colour largely determines the market demand for several cat breeds. The KIT proto-oncogene (KIT) gene is a key gene controlling melanoblast differentiation and melanogenesis. KIT mutations usually cause varied changes in coat colour in mammalian species. In this study, we used a pair of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to delete exon 17 of KIT in somatic cells isolated from two different Chinese Li Hua feline foetuses. Edited cells were used as donor nuclei for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to generate cloned embryos presenting an average cleavage rate exceeding 85%, and an average blastocyst formation rate exceeding 9.5%. 131 cloned embryos were transplanted into four surrogates, and all surrogates carried their pregnancies to term, and delivered 4.58% (6/131) alive cloned kittens, with 1.53% (2/131) being KIT-edited heterozygotes (KITD17/+). The KITD17/+ cats presented an obvious darkness reduction in the mackerel tabby coat. Immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of skin tissues indicated impaired proliferation and differentiation of melanoblasts caused by the lack of exon17 in feline KIT. To our knowledge, this is the first report on coat colour modification of cats through gene editing. The findings could facilitate further understanding of the regulatory role of KIT on feline coat colour and provide a basis for the breeding of cats with commercially desired coat colour.


Subject(s)
Cloning, Organism , Gene Editing , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit , Animals , Cats , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/metabolism , Gene Editing/veterinary , Gene Editing/methods , Cloning, Organism/veterinary , Cloning, Organism/methods , Hair Color/genetics , Nuclear Transfer Techniques/veterinary , Female
2.
Theriogenology ; 220: 43-55, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38471390

ABSTRACT

Genome editing in pigs for xenotransplantation has seen significant advances in recent years. This study compared three methodologies to generate gene-edited embryos, including co-injection of sperm together with the CRISPR-Cas9 system into oocytes, named ICSI-MGE (mediated gene editing); microinjection of CRISPR-Cas9 components into oocytes followed by in vitro fertilization (IVF), and microinjection of in vivo fertilized zygotes with the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Our goal was to knock-out (KO) porcine genes involved in the biosynthesis of xenoantigens responsible for the hyperacute rejection of interspecific xenografts, namely GGTA1, CMAH, and ß4GalNT2. Additionally, we attempted to KO the growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene with the aim of limiting the growth of porcine organs to a size that is physiologically suitable for human transplantation. Embryo development, pregnancy, and gene editing rates were evaluated. We found an efficient mutation of the GGTA1 gene following ICSI-MGE, comparable to the results obtained through the microinjection of oocytes followed by IVF. ICSI-MGE also showed higher rates of biallelic mutations compared to the other techniques. Five healthy piglets were born from in vivo-derived embryos, all of them exhibiting biallelic mutations in the GGTA1 gene, with three displaying mutations in the GHR gene. No mutations were observed in the CMAH and ß4GalNT2 genes. In conclusion, in vitro methodologies showed high rates of gene-edited embryos. Specifically, ICSI-MGE proved to be an efficient technique for obtaining homozygous biallelic mutated embryos. Lastly, only live births were obtained from in vivo-derived embryos showing efficient multiple gene editing for GGTA1 and GHR.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing , Animals , Swine/genetics , Humans , Male , Animals, Genetically Modified , Gene Editing/veterinary , Transplantation, Heterologous/veterinary , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/veterinary , Semen , Fertilization in Vitro/veterinary
3.
Theriogenology ; 218: 111-118, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320372

ABSTRACT

Genetically modified pigs play a critical role in mimicking human diseases, xenotransplantation, and the development of pigs resistant to viral diseases. The use of programmable endonucleases, including the CRISPR/Cas9 system, has revolutionized the generation of genetically modified pigs. This study evaluates the efficiency of electroporation of oocytes prior to fertilization in generating edited gene embryos for different models. For single gene editing, phospholipase C zeta (PLC ζ) and fused in sarcoma (FUS) genes were used, and the concentration of sgRNA and Cas9 complexes was optimized. The results showed that increasing the concentration resulted in higher mutation rates without affecting the blastocyst rate. Electroporation produced double knockouts for the TPC1/TPC2 genes with high efficiency (79 %). In addition, resistance to viral diseases such as PRRS and swine influenza was achieved by electroporation, allowing the generation of double knockout embryo pigs (63 %). The study also demonstrated the potential for multiple gene editing in a single step using electroporation, which is relevant for xenotransplantation. The technique resulted in the simultaneous mutation of 5 genes (GGTA1, B4GALNT2, pseudo B4GALNT2, CMAH and GHR). Overall, electroporation proved to be an efficient and versatile method to generate genetically modified embryonic pigs, offering significant advances in biomedical and agricultural research, xenotransplantation, and disease resistance. Electroporation led to the processing of numerous oocytes in a single session using less expensive equipment. We confirmed the generation of gene-edited porcine embryos for single, double, or quintuple genes simultaneously without altering embryo development to the blastocyst stage. The results provide valuable insights into the optimization of gene editing protocols for different models, opening new avenues for research and applications in this field.


Subject(s)
Swine Diseases , Virus Diseases , Humans , Animals , Swine/genetics , Animals, Genetically Modified , CRISPR-Cas Systems , RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/veterinary , Gene Editing/methods , Fertilization in Vitro/veterinary , Oocytes , Electroporation/veterinary , Electroporation/methods , Virus Diseases/veterinary , Swine Diseases/genetics
4.
Theriogenology ; 218: 126-136, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325149

ABSTRACT

In reproductive biology, understanding the effects of novel techniques on early embryo development is of paramount importance. To date, the effects of electrical activation on oocytes prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF) are not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of oocyte electroporation prior to IVF on embryo development and to differentiate between true embryos and parthenotes by using a TPCN2 knock-out (KO) male to evaluate the presence of the KO allele in the resulting blastocysts. The study consisted of three experiments. The first one examined oocyte electroporation with and without subsequent IVF and found that electroporated oocytes had higher activation rates, increased occurrence of a single pronucleus, and no effect on sperm penetration. Cleavage rates improved in electroporated oocytes, but blastocyst rates remained constant. Genotype analysis revealed a significant increase in the proportion of parthenotes in the electroporated groups compared to the IVF control (30.2 % vs. 6.8 %). The second experiment compared two electroporation media, Opti-MEM and Nuclease-Free Duplex Buffer (DB). DB induced higher oocyte degeneration rates, and lower cleavage and blastocyst rates than Opti-MEM, while parthenogenetic formation remained consistent (60.0 and 48.5 %). In the third experiment, the timing of electroporation relative to IVF was evaluated (1 h before IVF, immediately before IVF and 7 h after IVF). Electroporation immediately before IVF resulted in higher activation rates and different pronuclear proportions compared to the other timing groups. The penetration rate was higher in the immediate electroporation group, and cleavage rate improved in all electroporated groups compared to the control. Blastocyst rates remained constant. Genotyping revealed no significant differences in parthenote proportions among the timing groups, but these were higher than the control (56.25 %, 63.89 %, 51.61 %, 2.44 %, respectively), and showed higher mutation rates when electroporation was performed 7 h after IVF. Overall, this comprehensive study sheds light on the potential of electroporation for creating genetically modified embryos and the importance of media selection and timing in the process, the best media being the Opti-MEM and the more efficient timing regarding mutation rate, 7 h post-IVF, even when the parthenote formation did not differ among electroporated groups. Further studies are needed to reduce the parthenogenetic activation while maintaining high mutation rates to optimize the use of this procedure for the generation of gene-edited pig embryos by oocyte/zygote electroporation.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Semen , Male , Animals , Swine , Gene Editing/veterinary , Parthenogenesis , Oocytes/physiology , Embryonic Development/physiology , Electroporation/veterinary , Electroporation/methods , Blastocyst/physiology , Fertilization in Vitro/veterinary
5.
J Vet Sci ; 25(1): e10, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38311323

ABSTRACT

In livestock industry, there is growing interest in methods to increase the production efficiency of livestock to address food shortages, given the increasing global population. With the advancements in gene engineering technology, it is a valuable tool and has been intensively utilized in research specifically focused on human disease. In historically, this technology has been used with livestock to create human disease models or to produce recombinant proteins from their byproducts. However, in recent years, utilizing gene editing technology, cattle with identified genes related to productivity can be edited, thereby enhancing productivity in response to climate change or specific disease instead of producing recombinant proteins. Furthermore, with the advancement in the efficiency of gene editing, it has become possible to edit multiple genes simultaneously. This cattle breed improvement has been achieved by discovering the genes through the comprehensive analysis of the entire genome of cattle. The cattle industry has been able to address gene bottlenecks that were previously impossible through conventional breeding systems. This review concludes that gene editing is necessary to expand the cattle industry, improving productivity in the future. Additionally, the enhancement of cattle through gene editing is expected to contribute to addressing environmental challenges associated with the cattle industry. Further research and development in gene editing, coupled with genomic analysis technologies, will significantly contribute to solving issues that conventional breeding systems have not been able to address.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Genetic Engineering , Animals , Cattle/genetics , Humans , Gene Editing/veterinary , Genetic Engineering/methods , Genetic Engineering/veterinary , Breeding , Genome , Livestock/genetics , Recombinant Proteins
6.
Zool Res ; 45(2): 253-262, 2024 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287906

ABSTRACT

Animal models are extensively used in all aspects of biomedical research, with substantial contributions to our understanding of diseases, the development of pharmaceuticals, and the exploration of gene functions. The field of genome modification in rabbits has progressed slowly. However, recent advancements, particularly in CRISPR/Cas9-related technologies, have catalyzed the successful development of various genome-edited rabbit models to mimic diverse diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, immunodeficiencies, aging-related ailments, neurological diseases, and ophthalmic pathologies. These models hold great promise in advancing biomedical research due to their closer physiological and biochemical resemblance to humans compared to mice. This review aims to summarize the novel gene-editing approaches currently available for rabbits and present the applications and prospects of such models in biomedicine, underscoring their impact and future potential in translational medicine.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Veterinary Drugs , Humans , Rabbits , Animals , Mice , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/veterinary , Models, Animal
8.
Anim Sci J ; 94(1): e13878, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818780

ABSTRACT

The transfection efficiency of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes was compared using three nonviral vector transfection reagents: nonliposomal polymeric (TransIT-X2), lipid nanoparticle delivery (CRISPRMAX), and peptide (ProteoCarry) systems. Porcine zona pellucida-free zygotes and embryos were incubated for 5 h with CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), guide RNA (gRNA) targeting GGTA1, and one of the reagents. In Experiment 1, optimization of Cas9 protein to gRNA molar ratios of 1:2, 2:2, and 4:2, along with single or double doses of reagents, was performed on zygotes at 10 h post-in vitro fertilization. In Experiment 2, optimization of timing was performed at 10 or 29 h post-in vitro fertilization, using optimal molar ratios and reagent doses. Blastocyst formation, mutation rates, and mutation efficiency were measured in each experiment. For each reagent, a 4:2 Cas9:gRNA molar ratio and addition of a double reagent dose exhibited a higher mutation rate; however, blastocyst rate tended to decrease compared with that of control. Moreover, the optimal transfection time varied depending on the reagent, and the proportions of blastocysts carrying mutations were <34%. In conclusion, the above three transfectants allowed gene editing of porcine zygotes and embryos; however, this newly established chemistry-based technology needs further improvement, especially regarding editing efficiency and embryo development.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing , Swine/genetics , Animals , Gene Editing/veterinary , CRISPR-Associated Protein 9/genetics , Zygote , Embryonic Development
9.
Zool Res ; 44(6): 993-1002, 2023 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37759334

ABSTRACT

Targeting key enzymes that generate oxalate precursors or substrates is an alternative strategy to eliminate primary hyperoxaluria type I (PH1), the most common and life-threatening type of primary hyperoxaluria. The compact Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) from the Prevotella and Francisella 1 (Cpf1) protein simplifies multiplex gene editing and allows for all-in-one adeno-associated virus (AAV) delivery. We hypothesized that the multiplex capabilities of the Cpf1 system could help minimize oxalate formation in PH1 by simultaneously targeting the hepatic hydroxyacid oxidase 1 ( Hao1) and lactate dehydrogenase A ( Ldha) genes. Study cohorts included treated PH1 rats ( Agxt Q84X rats injected with AAV-AsCpf1 at 7 days of age), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-injected PH1 rats, untreated PH1 rats, and age-matched wild-type (WT) rats. The most efficient and specific CRISPR RNA (crRNA) pairs targeting the rat Hao1 and Ldha genes were initially screened ex vivo. In vivo experiments demonstrated efficient genome editing of the Hao1 and Ldha genes, primarily resulting in small deletions. This resulted in decreased transcription and translational expression of Hao1 and Ldha. Treatment significantly reduced urine oxalate levels, reduced kidney damage, and alleviated nephrocalcinosis in rats with PH1. No liver toxicity, ex-liver genome editing, or obvious off-target effects were detected. We demonstrated the AAV-AsCpf1 system can target multiple genes and rescue the pathogenic phenotype in PH1, serving as a proof-of-concept for the development of multiplex genome editing-based gene therapy.


Subject(s)
Hyperoxaluria, Primary , Animals , Rats , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Editing/veterinary , Hyperoxaluria, Primary/genetics , Hyperoxaluria, Primary/therapy , Hyperoxaluria, Primary/veterinary , Liver , Oxalates
11.
Anim Sci J ; 94(1): e13842, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37218074

ABSTRACT

Genetic mosaicism is considered one of the main limitations of the electroporation method used to transfer CRISPR-Cas9/guide RNA (gRNA) into porcine zygotes. We hypothesized that fertilization of oocytes with sperm from gene-deficient boars, in combination with electroporation (EP) to target the same region of the gene in subsequent zygotes, would increase the gene modification efficiency. As myostatin (MSTN) and α1,3-galactosyltransferase (GGTA1) have beneficial effects on agricultural production and xenotransplantation, respectively, we used these two genes to test our hypothesis. Spermatozoa from gene-knockout boars were used for oocyte fertilization in combination with EP to transfer gRNAs targeting the same gene region to zygotes. No significant differences in the rates of cleavage and blastocyst formation as well as in the mutation rates of blastocysts were observed between the wild-type and gene-deficient spermatozoa groups, irrespective of the targeted gene. In conclusion, the combination of fertilization with gene-deficient spermatozoa and gene editing of the same targeted gene region using EP had no beneficial effects on embryo genetic modification, indicating that EP alone is a sufficient tool for genome modification.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Zygote , Male , Animals , Swine , Gene Editing/veterinary , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Semen , Electroporation/veterinary , RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems
12.
J Anim Sci ; 1012023 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36897830

ABSTRACT

Gene editing has the potential to expedite the rate of genetic gain for complex traits. However, changing nucleotides (i.e., QTN) in the genome can affect the additive genetic relationship among individuals and, consequently, impact genetic evaluations. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to estimate the impact of including gene-edited individuals in the genetic evaluation and investigate modeling strategies to mitigate potential errors. For that, a beef cattle population was simulated for nine generations (N = 13,100). Gene-edited sires (1, 25, or 50) were introduced in generation 8. The number of edited QTN was 1, 3, or 13. Genetic evaluations were performed using pedigree, genomic data, or a combination of both. Relationships were weighted based on the effect of the edited QTN. Comparisons were made using the accuracy, average absolute bias, and dispersion of the estimated breeding values (EBV). In general, the EBV of the first generation of progeny of gene-edited sires were associated with greater average absolute bias and overdispersion than the EBV of the progeny of non-gene-edited sires (P ≤ 0.001). Weighting the relationship matrices increased (P ≤ 0.001) the accuracy of EBV when the gene-edited sires were introduced by 3% and decreased (P ≤ 0.001) the average absolute bias and dispersion for the progeny of gene-edited sires. For the second generation of descendants of gene-edited sires, the absolute bias increased as the number of edited alleles increased; however, the rate of increase in absolute bias was 0.007 for each allele edited when the relationship matrices were weighted compared with 0.10 when the relationship matrices were not weighted. Overall, when gene-edited sires are included in genetic evaluations, error is introduced in the EBV, such that the EBV of progeny of gene-edited sires are underestimated. Hence, the progeny of gene-edited sires would be less likely to be selected to be parents of the next generation than what was expected based on their true genetic merit. Therefore, modeling strategies such as weighting the relationship matrices are essential to avoid incorrect selection decisions if animals that have been edited for QTN underlying complex traits are introduced into genetic evaluations.


Coupling gene editing, a technology with the potential to make specific changes to DNA sequence (e.g., quantitative trait nucleotide, QTN), with genomic selection can generate faster genetic gain in economically important traits. However, gene editing would impact the genetic relationship among individuals and, consequently, genetic evaluations. The objectives of this study were to understand how gene editing impacts genetic prediction and develop strategies to mitigate potential errors in estimated breeding values (EBV). A beef cattle population was simulated (N = 13,100; nine generations) with the introduction of gene-edited sires in generation 8. Genetic evaluations were performed using pedigree and genomic data. Relationships were weighted based on the effect of the edited QTN. In general, the EBV of the first generation of progeny of gene-edited sires were associated with greater average absolute bias and overdispersion than the EBV of the progeny of non-gene-edited sires. Weighting the relationship matrices decreased the average absolute bias and dispersion for the progeny of gene-edited sires. For the second generation of descendants of gene-edited sires, the absolute bias increased by 0.10 for each allele edited. By weighting the relationship matrices, the rate of increase in absolute bias per allele decreased to 0.007. Therefore, when gene-edited sires are included in genetic evaluations, strategies such as weighting the relationship matrices should be considered to avoid incorrect selection decisions.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Genomics , Cattle/genetics , Animals , Alleles , Pedigree , Gene Editing/veterinary , Nucleotides , Models, Genetic , Genotype , Phenotype
13.
Theriogenology ; 197: 177-185, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525857

ABSTRACT

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) 9 system has been a recent focus of breeders owing to its potential to improve economically significant traits of livestock. The introduction of defined point mutations into the ovine genome via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair has been reported; however, indel and mosaic events observed in genetically modified animals limit the practical application of this system in sheep breeding. The FecGF mutation (g. G1111A, p. V371 M) in the growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) gene is strongly associated with litter size in Belclare and Norwegian White Sheep. In the present study, we introduced the FecGF mutation in GDF9 by co-injecting the CRISPR/Cas9 system, single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN), and Scr7 into ovine zygotes. Scr7 at various concentrations (0 µM, 1 µM, and 2 µM) had no adverse effects on embryonic development in vitro. No significant differences in total mutation, point mutation, and indel rates in embryos were observed among groups treated with different concentrations of Scr7. However, the mosaicism rates of embryos from zygotes microinjected with 1 and 2 µM Scr7 were significantly lower than that for 0 µM Scr7 (7.7% and 7.5% vs. 19.7%). We successfully obtained lambs with defined nucleotide substitutions by the coinjection of Cas9 mRNA, sgRNA, ssODN, and 1 µM Scr7 into Altay sheep zygotes. The single nucleotide mutation efficiency was 7.69% (3/39) in newborn lambs, with one mosaic. Our findings provide evidence that Scr7 could improve the specificity of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for the introduction of a defined point mutation in livestock to some extent.


Subject(s)
Gene Editing , Growth Differentiation Factor 9 , Sheep , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Embryonic Development , Gene Editing/veterinary , Mutation , Oligodeoxyribonucleotides , Sheep/genetics , Zygote , Growth Differentiation Factor 9/genetics
14.
Poult Sci ; 102(3): 102377, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36586387

ABSTRACT

In hens, egg production depends on the development of germ cells in the ovary. Germ cells are established before birth, and their number gradually decreases during their lifespan. Therefore, it is essential to determine the time points of massive germ cell loss and the underlying mechanism. In this study, a gene-edited chicken with mCherry fluorescence specifically expressed in the germline was generated by the integration of the mCherry gene into the 3'-end of the DAZL locus, which facilitated the isolation of germ cells from the gonads of DAZL-mCherry embryos or chicks and quantification using flow cytometry based on the observation of red fluorescence. The results demonstrated the dynamics of germ cell development from embryos at 17 d of hatching (dh) to chickens at 7 d post-hatch (dph) and revealed a substantial loss of germ cells in the late embryonic stage (18 -19 dh) and post-hatch period (2 -3 dph). Additionally, the number of germ cells in DAZL × Guangxi Ma chicken was significantly higher than that in DAZL × Lohmann Pink chicken at 19 dh and 3 dph (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the numbers of germ cells positively correlated with the body weight in DAZL × Lohmann Pink chicken. In conclusion, our results showed the dynamics of germ cell development in chicken ovaries during peri-hatch periods and indicated the time point of substantial germ cell loss. The results provide evidence for further exploration of the underlying mechanism and serve as a reference for chicken breeding and management.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Gene Editing , Animals , Female , Chickens/genetics , Gene Editing/veterinary , China , Gonads , Germ Cells
15.
Vet Res Commun ; 47(1): 1-16, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35781172

ABSTRACT

Livestock is an essential life commodity in modern agriculture involving breeding and maintenance. The farming practices have evolved mainly over the last century for commercial outputs, animal welfare, environment friendliness, and public health. Modifying genetic makeup of livestock has been proposed as an effective tool to create farmed animals with characteristics meeting modern farming system goals. The first technique used to produce transgenic farmed animals resulted in random transgene insertion and a low gene transfection rate. Therefore, genome manipulation technologies have been developed to enable efficient gene targeting with a higher accuracy and gene stability. Genome editing (GE) with engineered nucleases-Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) regulates the targeted genetic alterations to facilitate multiple genomic modifications through protein-DNA binding. The application of genome editors indicates usefulness in reproduction, animal models, transgenic animals, and cell lines. Recently, CRISPR/Cas system, an RNA-dependent genome editing tool (GET), is considered one of the most advanced and precise GE techniques for on-target modifications in the mammalian genome by mediating knock-in (KI) and knock-out (KO) of several genes. Lately, CRISPR/Cas9 tool has become the method of choice for genome alterations in livestock species due to its efficiency and specificity. The aim of this review is to discuss the evolution of engineered nucleases and GETs as a powerful tool for genome manipulation with special emphasis on its applications in improving economic traits and conferring resistance to infectious diseases of animals used for food production, by highlighting the recent trends for maintaining sustainable livestock production.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases , Animals , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases/genetics , Zinc Finger Nucleases/genetics , Gene Editing/veterinary , Gene Editing/methods , Mammals/genetics , Livestock/genetics
16.
Avian Pathol ; 52(1): 1-11, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36278430

ABSTRACT

Major advances in pathogen identification, treatment, vaccine development, and avian immunology have enabled the enormous expansion in global poultry production over the last 50 years. Looking forward, climate change, reduced feed, reduced water access, new avian pathogens and restrictions on the use of antimicrobials threaten to hamper further gains in poultry productivity and health. The development of novel in vitro cell culture systems, coupled with new genetic tools to investigate gene function, will aid in developing novel interventions for existing and newly emerging poultry pathogens. Our growing capacity to cryopreserve and generate genome-edited chicken lines will also be useful for developing improved chicken breeds for poultry farmers and conserving chicken genetic resources.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Poultry , Animals , Chickens/genetics , Gene Editing/veterinary
17.
Vet Rec ; 191(10): 402, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36398808
18.
Poult Sci ; 101(12): 102174, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36240636

ABSTRACT

Advanced animal reproductive and breeding biotechnology has made it possible to alter traits or create new genetic resources by the direct knock-in or knock-out of target genes. Base editing technology can achieve single-base mutations without double-stranded DNA breaks, and is a promising tool for use in the genetic modification and breeding of livestock. However, the application of base editors (BEs) in chicken has not been optimized. We evaluated the efficacy of BE4max in chicken somatic cells (DF-1). The key element of BE4max, cytosine deaminase (APOBEC), was optimized for chicken. The base editing efficiency of the optimized chBE4max editor, compared with the original BE4max editor, was improved by 10.4% ± 4.6. By inhibiting the expression of the uracil DNA glycosylase-related gene methyl binding domain protein 4 (MBD4) by siRNA in chicken DF-1 cells, the editing efficiency was enhanced by 4.43% ± 1.4 compared to the control. These results suggest that this editor may have applications in poultry breeding studies.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Chickens , Animals , Chickens/genetics , Gene Editing/veterinary , Gene Editing/methods , Mutation
20.
Theriogenology ; 193: 77-86, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36156427

ABSTRACT

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are widely used in the field of genetically modified organism production. In this work, transduction of bovine embryos by AAV was selected as a potential approach to perform genetic modifications: we have used recombinant AAV to produce GFP-positive bovine embryos. Five different AAV serotypes were used to evaluate their ability to deliver genetic material into the bovine embryos. AAV9 serotype demonstrated minimal effectiveness (38,10%) as the genetic material transfer tool. Four other serotypes of AAVs (AAV1, AAV2, AAV6 and AAV-DJ) showed very close transduction efficiency (52,94-58,33%). CD209 is a C-type lectin receptor which is presented on the surface of macrophages and dendritic cells. CD209 recognizes a broad range of pathogens in a rather nonspecific manner. Production of CD209 knock-out is relevant for better understanding of infection mechanisms. Potentially, production of such knock-out may enable animals to become resistant to various infections. We have analyzed DNA samples from 22 blastocysts obtained after in vitro culture of zygotes subjected to recombinant AAV action. We have detected that 3 of 22 analyzed blastocysts contained mosaic CD209 frameshifts. Therefore, we have demonstrated proof of principle that application of AAV as a genome editing tool is an effective method for obtaining genetically modified cattle embryos.


Subject(s)
Dependovirus , Genetic Vectors , Animals , Cattle , Dependovirus/genetics , Gene Editing/veterinary , Lectins, C-Type/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...